Alex Rybakov vs Ronald Hohmann Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

In recent competition, Rybakov has demonstrated a slightly superior second serve performance, successfully securing 47.01% of points on his second serve, in comparison to Hohmann's 40.76%. Such statistical precedents are strongly correlated with predicting match outcomes, lending Rybakov a slight edge in this aspect.

Analyzing return game statistics within recent form reveals that Hohmann has been slightly more adept at winning second serve return points, with a success rate of 46.8%, compared to Rybakov's 45.3%. However, when it comes to first serve returns, Rybakov outshines Hohmann at 26.56% over Hohmann's 24.39%. These figures are critical when evaluating which player might hold an advantage in this head-to-head encounter.

Under pressure, Rybakov has shown a greater capability to save breakpoints, succeeding in 54.55% of attempts, whereas Hohmann has managed to save 48.74%. This is a pivotal statistic for those considering in-game betting predictions, hinting at Rybakov's resilience.

Considering overall match performance over the past year, Rybakov has a slight upper hand with a 62.5% win rate (W/L 30/18), whereas Hohmann has won 60% (W/L 18/12). This forms a foundational basis for overall head-to-head comparisons. In terms of surface proficiency, both players excel on indoor hard courts; Rybakov's career win rate stands at 63%, while Hohmann follows closely with 61%.

The distinction in player level competition is apparent. Rybakov has primarily competed in Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, achieving a 59.26% win rate, whilst Hohmann's engagements lie mostly within Future/Satellite/ITF tournaments $10K, maintaining a 60% victory record.

Opponent quality provides a significant indicator of experience, with Rybakov having faced competitors averaging a rank of 398.71 compared to Hohmann's average opponent rank of 121.03 over the last 12 months. Despite this, if the match extends to a deciding set, Rybakov has a stronger track record, seizing victory in 58% of those scenarios, as opposed to Hohmann’s 50% conversion rate.

Evaluating break point conversion under recent conditions, Rybakov succeeds in 31.34% of his opportunities, while Hohmann shows slightly higher effectiveness at 34.18%. These insights are particularly useful for those engaging in live betting.

Based on these cumulative statistics, the analysis slightly favors Rybakov to emerge victorious in this upcoming match. His marginally superior performance metrics, resilience under mission-critical situations, and broader competition experience combine to forecast his triumph over Hohmann.